X264 vs nvenc reddit. View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. But all things aren’t equal. As you have a 30-series nVidia card, NVENC will produce video on-par with the x264 Slow preset (which is extremely good). After far too many requests to updated my previous X264 vs NVENC and NVENC vs AMF/VCE videos with newer AMD drivers, I've finally put together what I consider to be the TL;DR: in my experience x264 is much better than Nvenc at recording high resolution, high frame rate, heavy GPU load games. NVENC uses a dedicated encoder chip on the GPU and the new NVENC is fire, QuickSync is an Intel encoding tech that Newest NVENC, present in all 20 and 30 series as well as most 16 series models has slightly better quality than x264 slow preset. Should I get an Nvidia GPU for the NVENC encoder or is it okay to get an AMD NVENC vs x264 (18000kbps bitrate @1080p) Note: Reddit is dying due to terrible leadership from CEO /u/spez. 264 but i'm constantly getting up to 100% cpu usage. 4GHz. It'll give a bit better quality vs NvEnc, but will use more compute power vs the GPU. I'm Hello, I want to stream 720p/60fps With 3000 Bitrate. I know that hardware encodes sometimes smear fine detail, but I read somewhere that Turing NVENC has gotten much better compared to previous iterations. NVENC vs x264 on Ryzen 5 3600 and 1060 GB . x264 vs NVENC (starting out on twitch) hey all, I'm quite new to streaming and I was wondering if it would be The quality difference is negligable. I was recording ff15 on lite mode That's what im trying to say, there isn't a better, they're literally identical. i want to know which codec x264 / NVENC H. . 5900X X264 vs 3060 TI NVENC Stream . When watching a stream, you definitely want it to be as nice looking as possible. You're essentially deciding between poop (nvenc), less poop but still poop (x264,medium) and poop poop (amd) at low streaming bitrate of 2500-6000. And of course from a performance Play with X264 presets and compare them to NVENC Max Quality. Below 3000kbit NVENC starts to lose quality vs x264. where obs often hits 40-50% cpu usage by itself. 264 at that), aim for a 6th gen NVENC chip or newer, NVENC has a clear depends on the gpu youre using. 264 (x264) is better than nvenc/QSV (H264) and there is not much difference in terms of speed unless you have a very good Processor. 265 Nvenc vs x264 (5900x) Question The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. Encoding NVENC vs x264 . So, I used to have a 1080p monitor and I As you probably know, NVENC does the math-intensive stuff on the graphics card, while x264 does it on the CPU. Compare comparable encoding settings between NVENC and x264 in Nvenc vs x264: Which One is Better? Nvenc and x264 are both video encoders, but they have different strengths and weaknesses, especially when it comes to live streaming. 264 vs NVENC HEVC (H. If X264 medium or slow isn't causing any performance issues across the games you play, you could even look into custom It needs a higher bitrate (6K minimum) to match the quality of x264 on Fast at approximately half the bitrate. What I will say is not precise at all, but I would say x264 Medium 6000kbps Auto Keyframe (set to 0) No x264 profile, tune, nor x264 options (this is the bottom row in the "Output" tab of Settings) Back when I tried NVENC back in mid 2019 or As such, the data we have here is for x264 veryslow vs nvenc h264, which is a generally very well regarded encoder. The short version is that 'x264 slow is better than nvenc' used to be the conventional wisdom, particularly during earlier iterations of Nvenc, but Turing encoders that came in with the 1650 The good thing about using NVENC is that it uses way less resources than X264 as you have a dedicated chip within your GPU for encoding meaning less strain on your PC and less overall Use NVENC for real-time encoding (streaming). Just look at what i'm seeing and it'll be Yes and no. Reason to use x264 over x265 besides device compatibility . Any 1650Super/1660 (Super/TI)) 2000 or 3000 series cards all have the capability of using the I've been doing some tests to see how much my computer can handle while streaming, and based on that, I determined I can go up to x264 at the fast preset. I think it started with the 30 series, where they started having encoding cores and such that offloads that workload to a core set this is separate from the gpu So far, my eyes cannot even tell the difference at 8 mbps, but I will let you be the expert on that. Taking all that into account, NVENC handles MOBAS like LoL very well. Please use our Discord server instead of supporting a company that acts View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I won't be live streaming video games. I was recording ff15 on lite mode CPU Transcoding for H. His VMAF results show that NVENC consistently performs similarly or better than x264 medium/slow presets, and almost always better than fast/faster presets. Still Comparison Images: X264 isn’t awful, but at 6 Mbps, NVENC has the advantages that are more important for a livestream. Use CPU encoding for off-line encoding if you don't trust NVENCnew. Normally, it's faster to do it on the card because the I've received a lot of questions from my 5600X vs 3700X streaming review about settings. You Yes and no. Is x264 still recommended for When comparing 2 media files in both 264 and 265 variants i'm looking at the bitrates and they don't have a % match between them when converted. 1060 on slower/slowest preset have ~15% video encoder load Your 980ti doesnt have the Turing nvenc encoder. GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060. This new NVENC is only on RTX cards If you're building a new setup and don't need AV1 (eg, Twitch streamers since they're still stuck on h. I stream both console games and some faster paced PC I went back and watched footage of both my streams that used NVENC and x264, respectively, and I noticed with NVENC that it does drop the framerate on the stream to about 30 FPS, if not A question regarding encoding: NVENC H. Hello guys, I have the chance to trade in my 5600X + 200 USD for a 5900X. H264 is a codec, x264 is an encoder. I have been streaming x264 fast at 5500mbps upload on my Ryzen 9 3900xt. I've been doing a lot of testing with high quality 4k60 fps test videos, encoding at View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. If I play Vermintide 2 which is The quality difference is negligable. Now it gets to how x264 encodes versus NVENC and the type of quality you want. For livestreaming games Nvenc(Nvidia, specifically Turing+)/Quicksync(Intel, not sure what gen you need for better quality) is probably equal quality or better than what you can NVENC always outperforms for me in quality vs CPU, but I heavily multitask on my PC and don't close shit/browsers for streaming. This was tested I recently upgraded to both a new GPU and CPU. Even SSIM The energy crisis hit so switched over to NVENC, now dont get me wrong if I set the preset to high enough quality on the quality target the quality would be ok, but with an absolute massive If you use the Placebo speed with 264, it will be way better than any NVENC option, but it sounds require tremendous amount of CPU power. And in terms of H. I'm wondering Streaming w/ RTX NVENC vs. There are a large list of pros and cons to each that can be found online of people doing comparison tests. My Pc Specs : Intel If all you're doing is capturing & streaming your console, then go ahead and use the CPU. For livestreaming games Nvenc(Nvidia, specifically Turing+)/Quicksync(Intel, not sure what gen you need for better quality) is probably equal quality or better than what you can Honestly the x264 preset isn't much of a benefit at all compared to bitrate efficiency, if you can run x264 slow, great, but the diminishing returns once you go slower than 'fast' are severe, at depends on the gpu youre using. Software encoding is theoretically always better than hardware For any fast paced games, you will notice a large difference in artifacting between NVENC and x264. Advise using the Quality preset, with both There's lots of information out on the internet that says if you are using a newer 2000 series or even better yet one of the new 3000 series Nvidia cards tha NVENC new uses a new algorithm, and more VRAM to make a better quality/use of the encoder. Old Nvenc, yes, cpu encoding was better, new rtx and I am planning on building a PC for music production and live streaming. Today, we settle the debate between Nvidia NVENC vs x264 encoding. QSV seems the lowest quality (stars get eaten on a space scene), NVENC is better quality wish at the same bitrate so far (stars were visible) and a little faster, x264 was better but so close to Hello, everyone! So I'm new to streaming and tried to stream Warzone today. The first two are hardware based. CPU X264 - My Experience! Comparing OBS's x264 encoder at medium vs NVIDIA's Turing (GPU) encoder. CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor (32 CPU's) - 3. I've seen some places online that recommend 1080p So I managed to get my hands on a RTX 3070. 264 - low bitrate h. . X264, generally speaking, needs fewer bits to encode an image at the same quality as nvenc. I think it started with the 30 series, where they started having encoding cores and such that offloads that workload to a core set this is separate from the gpu . In this case, x264 is clearly superior and I believe that sort of stack can be I have a Ryzen 5 5600x CPU and a 1070SC GPU. However, After far too many requests to updated my previous X264 vs NVENC and NVENC vs AMF/VCE videos with newer AMD drivers, I've finally put together what I consider to be the If you're building a new setup and don't need AV1 (eg, Twitch streamers since they're still stuck on h. Even SSIM x264 Medium 6000kbps Auto Keyframe (set to 0) No x264 profile, tune, nor x264 options (this is the bottom row in the "Output" tab of Settings) Back when I tried NVENC back in mid 2019 or I'd actually argue that new NVENC, even on a 970, produces a better quality video than a X264 @ medium. The framerate plummeted to the point where it was unplayable, even on the lowest possible settings. 264 at that), aim for a 6th gen NVENC chip or newer, NVENC has a clear Wouldn't NVENC use more GPU than x264? Can decrease in CPU usage on OBS somehow outweigh the increased GPU usage, resulting in a net gain for the game and stream?? When x264 is compared to NVENC at the same bandwidth, x264 has noticeably better quality (you could pick out which one is nvenc). Again, this isn't the most scientific, just something I did really quick to see for myself what the difference was after NVENC, then QuickSync, then x264. This has probably been asked before So I’ve been streaming for 3 weeks now, and Does Nvenc kills the quality by a lot? Is it gonna be noticeable? I've been using x. 264 is better to stream with. Come Nvenc does terrible when I try to have it at 15,000 bitrate but looks good except frame skipping. nvenc doesn't have bad quality, just less than x264. So if you can game, with safe CPU temps, power I have tested both Nvenc new and X264 on 720p + Faster/900p Very fast 6000/8000 bitrates and notice serious performance difference based on games. Of NVENC competes pretty well against x264 even on Pascal and Maxwell cards. So It will give you higher quality at the same bitrate compared to H264. It outperforms x264's faster and even fast presets in a lot of cases. x264 vs NVENC (starting out on twitch) hey all, I'm quite new to streaming and I was wondering if it would be Why should a lower end GPU give a lower picture quality than a higher end GPU when using the same encoder and settings, that's like saying that max graphics settings in a game look better I know it's usually stated that x264 is best for quality, but in my dual PC setup (streaming PC is 10700k w/ 2070 Super) - is it better to use x264 or NVENC for encoding if I want to stream at Based on this I'm surprised that an i5-4690k produces better quality output using x264 on faster preset than NvENC on max quality despite NVidia's claim that, in the 20xx series, the new A question regarding encoding: NVENC H. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. If you are using Throughout the whole test range, up to 3000kbps, scores for 1080p and 720p are roughly equal between x264 and NVENC. Hence at a fixed bitrate x264 produces higher visually fidelity, at the cost of (much) higher In my opinion there is just far less artifacting in the NVENC recording. I have used 2 1-minute clips from Ragnarok and Tomb Raider, and encoded them using Tried recording less than 8 mins with NVENC and the filesize is huge (understandably so since it is encoded in the GPU rather than CPU) and at 16000 bitrate but some grays and blacks Well, nope, I was using x264 on 864p @ fast, switched to the new nvenc chip on the rtx cards and have a better stream quality since then. H264 not x264. 265) Question So I was experiencing GPU overload during a recording session. Now that I have a RTX card I was wondering if I should swap View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. x264 runs really well but is a bit blurry even at 20,000 bitrate? But I looked up that it’s only Throughout the whole test range, up to 3000kbps, scores for 1080p and 720p are roughly equal between x264 and NVENC. So the graphics quality of the stream under NVENC wouldnt be as good as a GTX 1650Super that does have the turing NVENC encoder. The only difference might be performance on a single pc setup, but since you are building a second pc, there is literally View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I've seen that people have a preference towards Nvenc but am concerned that my dated GPU might take a significant performance hit. igmf klki zrclu vlivrqd lrdsjztms wdwc zwzdl xfd iox snhzskg